Looking for:
Diferencia entre windows server 2012 datacenter y standard free download |
Free Download Windows Server R2 ISO File - Technig.Comparison of Standard and Datacenter editions Windows Server | Microsoft Docs
- Diferencia entre windows server 2012 datacenter y standard free download
- Windows Server Essentials vs. Standard vs. Datacenter
Our vSphere hosts are licensed for Datacenter so my question is simply whether there is any pro or con basing our template on Standard or Datacenter? My understanding is that the feature set is identical and that the Datacenter differences are in terms of product rights rather than features?
I follow you Hutch, and I am also confused as to why you have to select either standard or datacenter at the install if their is really no difference other than number of virtual instances. It seems that standard really only exists on paper, and the install should be the same Is a bit of an odd one.
I guess I have been installing standard on my VM's not realizing there is no real difference from datacenter. Does the Datacentre licence not just allow you to install as many VMs as your system can support? Correct, the only difference between Standard and Datacenter is the number of VM's per physical host they are licensed for. We have made it a point to aquire Datacenter instead of Standard from now on.
We have a price advantage being a non-profit, but if you are going to move forward with virtual environments then I see no reason not to stick with Datacenter. The only thing to remember about the datacentre edition is that it is still licensed per CPU socket last I checked anyway , which may end up increasing costs for you. Datacenter makes sense if you think that you might need extra servers at a future point in time. Enterprise I think allowed you up to 4 VMs while Datacenter was unlimited.
What I'm asking is whether there is any real world difference between selecting "Standard" or "Datacenter" from the installer, assuming we're licensed for Datacenter and plan on being for the foreseeable? It's a bit dangerous though.
It's amazing how many new servers you acquire when there's no cost or effort to spin up a new one. So you are not talking about licensing but about which version of the OS to install on each VM with your Datacenter license?
In that case, you need to look at this:. Pricon Enterprise Technologies is an IT service provider. But if he is virtualizing this, wouldn't it be best he go with standard due to the cost point if the 2 versions are basically the same. Also, Standard can have more than 2 VM's as long as you add the extra standard license to the server. There is a cutoff point that MS suggest and that is if you are hosting and that is This isn't about licensing, it's about if there is any difference in functionality whatsoever depending if you choose Datacenter or Standard from the installer.
There is no difference. If you are licensed for Datacenter, then just use the datacenter "version". That is what we do. See the link I posted earlier for a comparison. It shows that "Virtualization rights" is the only difference between Standard and Datacenter. The differences with the other versions are greater. In older versions of Windows Server there were functional differences, such as Server Enterprise being used as a certificate issuing server was able to auto enroll users and computers with certificates whereas Standard would not.
I have seen nothing in Server to say if there are any functional differences other than virtualization rights and max hardware supported. We are using Citrix 6. It's very simple. But you still install Standard for your VMs. I am turning my computer into a server it has one cpu and 12gig of ram.
I don't know much about server software and my thought was to put windows server on it and do two vms with windows 7 pro as clienst for educational purposes with two other desk tops on a home lab.
My question is with standard you can have two vms, is that so you can install windows server on them for additional roles. Another question is can the host have other roles besides managing the other servers and since there is not much computing going on can I put a lot of roles on one server. To continue this discussion, please ask a new question. Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. Just about to start playing with server now we're on vSphere 5.
Best Answer. Ghost Chili. Verify your account to enable IT peers to see that you are a professional. View this "Best Answer" in the replies below ».
Popular Topics in Windows Server. Spiceworks Help Desk. The help desk software for IT. Track users' IT needs, easily, and with only the features you need. Learn More ».
Thai Pepper. Nick-C This person is a verified professional. JackLuminous wrote: Datacenter makes sense if you think that you might need extra servers at a future point in time. The only difference is licensing. Aaron DeLeskie This person is a verified professional.
You'd have to work out the economics, but we went with Datacenter as well. ErikN This person is a verified professional. I could not find a comparable table on the MS site. To be clear - we are licensed for Datacenter. He said that he already licensed Datacenter.
I went with Datacenter for the template. I still have no idea why tbh. That is the intended model. This topic has been locked by an administrator and is no longer open for commenting. Read these next
No comments:
Post a Comment